Consultancy bid production · Malaysia
Half of a tender score is data you already own.
Firm experience and expert CVs are worth 40–70 of 100 marks. They sit in scattered Word files, retyped by hand into every submission. This turns them into the bid.
The problem is not finding tenders
Eight platforms already tell a Malaysian firm a tender exists. None of them help it respond. So a small consultancy either skips the bid, or spends a partner's weekend retyping CVs it wrote three years ago.
Meanwhile the marks are sitting in a filing cabinet. The World Bank rubric that Malaysian ministries mirror scores firm experience and expert CVs at 40–70 of 100 — and weights relevance to this assignment at 60–80% of the CV mark. A generic CV is designed to score badly.
The seven-tender proof
In July, Pahang advertised the same drainage study seven
times — one brief, seven districts, RM 11,695,710
combined.
Same methodology. Same team. Seven submissions nobody had time to write.
A quarter of the consultancy board looks like this. Bid the first properly and the rest are variants — which is the whole argument for building this instead of hiring a writer per bid.
Working today
A report becomes a deck
Upload a finished report, get it back on your template with every figure traced to the page it came from.
Eligibility before you pay
Every open consultancy tender judged against your registrations — decided from the free notice, before the RM 100 document and the trip to the counter.